George Washington spent much of his life commanding the Continental Army against the British and keeping the fight alive, and then leading the young United States as its civilian President; but the quote attributed to him, selected for the Credo stamp series—"Observe good faith and justice toward all nations."—fails to sum up the man, his beliefs, or gravitas. The quote is too generic, too laid back. Any moralizer could talk about "good faith and justice." We hear stuff like that everyday. I prefer this quote from Washington, from a letter to James Madison:

This is hands-on thinking. He defines unity and disunity as different camps. Friends and critics alike described Washington as a hard, stoical man, accustomed to the discomfort of the military life. He drove his men with a fixed sense of purpose and tolerated foolishness from no one. He shared the privations of his men, which earned him their undying loyalty, and he never lost sight of the goal of independence.

When the Revolution ended in an American victory, Washington expressed the wish to return home and tend his plantation, but he could not do that, now. Washington had brought the new nation into existence; so he had to commit himself to maintain it. His second-in-command Alexander Hamilton told him, "You will permit me to say, it is indispensible (that) you should lend yourself to its first operation." Hamilton knew Washington was a keeper.

Washington had proven himself indispensible on numerous occasions before—perhaps no occasion more critical than during the Newburgh Conspiracy. The conspiracy started in 1783 when officers and men of the Continental Army decided to mutiny. They had not received their wages for over a year from the cash-strapped, amateurish Continental Congress. For that reason, renegade officers wanted a mutiny to force the Continental Congress to give them their back-pay.

Washington gathered intelligence on the mutiny, then confronted the mutineers and shamed them into abandoning their plan. He told them they should oppose anyone "who wickedly attempts to open the floodgates of civil discord."

Besides, he had a better idea—not a mutiny, but a second revolution to overturn the original Confederation. In its place, create a centralized federal republic, equip it with a budget to maintain an army, give it a centralized banking system, and a tripartite government—executive, legislative, and judicial. Hamilton and others coaxed him to attend the Constitutional Convention in 1787, guaranteeing that the Constitution passed.

Washington will always a keeper. When I think about the restiveness in the modern American public, the deep political divisions, and the beginnings of mutiny, we need to remember Washington's watershed statements about unity. Before he left office after serving as President for two terms, he gave a Farewell Address. Thanks to him, every President since has delivered a farewell address—although none as memorable as his.

Just look at the figures. In the first thirteen pages of his Farewell Address, he used "unity" fourteen times. "The unity of Government which constitutes you (as) one people is also now dear to you. It is justly so; for it is a main Pillar in the Edifice of your real independence . . . your tranquility at home, your peace abroad, of your prosperity, of that very liberty which you so highly prize."

Washington knew that America's independence and strength depend on unity. Once Americans can retain it, they will never settle for less; and the only way we can regain it is to divide the Disunited States and let the resulting nations govern themselves. A third revolution.



May 24, 2022

From the Dissenter's Dictionary: The Democratic Ideal—not so ideal?

During a trip to Germany a few years ago, I was sitting at breakfast reading newspapers and saw an article with a line that read "Agitators pressure our nation to democratize its institutions; but if they do this, will they make the society more compulsory?"

May 18, 2022

A Dissident's Dictionary-Fahrenheit 451

Does my reader feel unease about the trends in our society? Are you skeptical about its underlying value system—if there is a value system? Are you looking for a philosophical foundation to regain your footing and provide the basis for organized dissent? If you cannot check or alter the trends, you can at least understand their intentions.

May 17, 2022

A Dissident's Dictionary: Fahrenheit 451 2

Guy Montag meets a teenager named Clarisse McClellan at the beginning of the book. She goads Guy to review his life and start on a new course:

Lloyd Bowers


Facebook twitter Favorites google